Am I Wrong?!
- DeViney, Michael R.
- 11 March 2025
So, y’all know I can’t just go get on a plane and have a simple trip, right? Well, this flight to Dallas was under-booked. So, basically everyone
Snapshot: If You Want a Green POTUS, Nixon’s The One
- Midian, Patrick F.
- 9 August 2024

Review: “Death At Midnight (The Confession of an Executioner)”
- Skidmore, Gennifer
- 28 October 2023
Death at Midnight: The Confession of an Executioner written by Donald A. Cabana with
Contrast: Palestine v. Israel
- Staff
- 19 October 2023

To this editor, ModState serves an important function. Much more than a centrist platform that approaches discussion beyond hardline left and right
Review: “A Republic, If You Can Keep It”
- Skidmore, Gennifer
- 30 April 2023
“A Republic, If You Can Keep It” was written by Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and published in 2019. This book is a collection of speeches
Gonzo State: [Untitled]
- d'Aubigny, Rick
- 7 August 2021
Six Degrees of Knowin’ Nothin’: [Untitled]
- DeViney, Jack
- 13 August 2020
Am I Wrong?! The Cat's Where It Shat: A brief tale of a flight from Los Angeles to Dallas (en route to The Big Sleazy, New Orleans)
- DeViney, Michael R.
- 11 March 2025
So, y’all know I can’t just go get on a plane and have a simple trip, right? Well, this flight to Dallas was under-booked. So, basically everyone
Snapshot: If You Want a Green POTUS, Nixon’s The One Richard Nixon (not Carter, Clinton or Obama) is the spiritual successor to Teddy Roosevelt as America's Greenest President
- Midian, Patrick F.
- 9 August 2024

Review: “Death At Midnight (The Confession of an Executioner)” A Criminal Justice instructor to my big brother at Southern Miss, Don Cabana delivered a work that informs without telling you how to think.
- Skidmore, Gennifer
- 28 October 2023
Death at Midnight: The Confession of an Executioner written by Donald A. Cabana with
Contrast: Palestine v. Israel The title suggests a neat and straightforward collision. It is neither, but the series' 2nd entry marks the editorial debut of Candace Smith.
- Staff
- 19 October 2023

To this editor, ModState serves an important function. Much more than a centrist platform that approaches discussion beyond hardline left and right
Review: “A Republic, If You Can Keep It” A debut that veers into the irreverent whilst refraining from the ad hominem. Brilliant!
- Skidmore, Gennifer
- 30 April 2023
“A Republic, If You Can Keep It” was written by Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch and published in 2019. This book is a collection of speeches
Gonzo State: [Untitled] Meanwhile, in America...
- d'Aubigny, Rick
- 7 August 2021

“Bentley! Bentley. I suggest…I suggest that you do something different with your life right now.” This instruction was delivered by
Six Degrees of Knowin’ Nothin’: [Untitled]
- DeViney, Jack
- 13 August 2020

Does this era need introduction? Or, rather, may a suitable introduction be written? I report, you deride.
1: In any rational era, the sudden appearance
Contrast: Black Lives Matter v. All Lives Matter (et al) BLM meets ALM, etc., in this series pilot; Michael DeViney, Jr., marks his editorial debut with the rebuttal in the 2nd half of the piece.
- Staff
- 7 June 2020

Black Lives Matter: Let’s cut through the fat together, shall we? Yes or yes? Good. With that, we have a problem in America.
EDITORIAL: The Iran Crisis ModState Podcast Host and Associate Editor Nate Wellein brings a strong dose of calm, collected sensibility amidst a very volatile global situation.
- Wellein, Nate S.
- 7 January 2020

As I frequent news and social media sites after the assassination of General Soleimani, I notice again the divide that afflicts America. At ModState,
State of Mind: A Person is a Person A solemn topic marks the editorial debut of an immense psychological mind (and imminent PhD), Brittany Goforth. Nevertheless, the lingering poison in the sociopolitical landscape makes for apropos discussion at nearly all times. It's high time we dial it back from "11", 'Merica!
- Goforth, Brittany B.
- 24 December 2019

There’s a fundamental breakdown that, for whatever the reason may be, is completely disregarded by many modern Americans. While there are so many
INTERVIEW: GCHQ Endeavors to Bring Medical Marijuana to Mississippi Their COO, Emily Osborne Rhodes, graciously meets and fills us in. But for the record, there's something dank in Gluckstadt, Dude!
- Staff
- 7 August 2019

DeViney, J.: Emily, thank you for taking the time to talk about what it is you’re doing to improve the status quo in the State of Mississippi and, by proxy I feel, the nation.
Political Beast: Justin Amash and Why He Left The GOP Oh, the big "WHY?!"
- Coker, Gabe
- 7 July 2019

Justin Amash, Representative, 3rd Congressional District, Michigan, announced in an open letter on Independence
Political Beast: Democratic Debate Night 1 Round 2 Dembate!
- Coker, Gabe
- 2 July 2019

Here are the contestants again (in brief):
-Senator Cory Booker, New Jersey
-Julian Castro, former Secreatary of Housing an Urban Development
-Bill de Blasio, Mayor of NYC
Political Beast: Democratic Debate Night 1 Round 1 Dembate! [Or: "...our first round of candidates and the members of the inquisition..."]
- Coker, Gabe
- 1 July 2019

We at Political Beast aren’t known for breaking news, thus the delay in reviewing the performance of the Dem candidates at Night
Political Beast: “Bulletins”
- Coker, Gabe
- 9 June 2019
To say something needs no introduction begs the question, “So, why the [expletive deleted] are you introducing it, then?!” As a bastion of the independent media, however, with
Political Beast: Three-Year (Leather Anniversary) Retrospective
- Coker, Gabe
- 20 May 2019

On this, the third anniversary of the founding of the (multi) media beast that has become ModState, let’s take a quick look back at what we’ve accomplished this year, and what has kicked
PRESS RELEASE: Al Eldeen Dismissal
- Staff
- 18 May 2019
Saturday, 18 May 2019
ModState Magazine
Aurora, Colorado 80017
For Immediate Release
Aurora, Colorado – 18 May 2019 –

It is with the heaviest of hearts that we address what is certainly the darkest and saddest
Fabriqué en Babylon: Mueller’s Brass Tacks Vol. 2
- DeViney, Jack
- 12 May 2019

Beyond the distinct possibility being the more innocuous explanation previously stated by the Special Counsel himself, the assertion that McGhan is beyond reproach, that he had “no motive to lie or
Fabriqué en Babylon: Mueller’s Brass Tacks Vol. 1
- DeViney, Jack
- 18 April 2019

Quite a few million taxpayer dollars, countless hurt feelings and one slightly disgruntled POTUS later, I had my chance at last to consume the report of The Special Counsel, one Robert S. Mueller III.
Apologetics: Mssrs. Wellein and DeViney
- Grey, Dorian
- 23 February 2019

Any number of individuals have made use of our house ghost writer’s nom de plume to date. I am but the latest, having merely the sole distinction of being the only Englishman to use it.
In what feels
Executive Completion: American Scandal Primer Part One
- Leary, Teresa
- 13 September 2018

Yuri Kadobnov/AFP/Getty Images
As I began research for this article, I couldn’t help but take a closer look at the last few scandals that rocked
Patriotism in a Divided America
- Leary, Teresa
- 4 July 2018

We are the descendants of rebels. It does not matter if you were born on this soil or not, we all proudly remember the Fourth of July, 1776. Every year we
Zero Tolerance Equals Zero Humanity
- Leary, Teresa
- 22 June 2018
Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
Commentary on the Movie, “The Post” [Excerpt]
- Staff
- 23 May 2018
[The following is an excerpt from the blog and publishing site of Mr. Geoff Shepard, Esq., author of “The Real Watergate Scandal”, kindly used with permission of the author.]
The top-secret report which became known as the Pentagon Papers, officially titled United States – Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967: A Study Prepared by the Department of Defense, is an internal analysis of documentation about the origins and conduct of the Vietnam War from 1947 to the end of the Johnson Administration, prepared over the course of three years under the supervision of three anti-war DOD officials. It ultimately consisted of some 3,000 pages of analysis and 4,000 pages of documentation. It was not peer reviewed or circulated outside of DOD.
Publication of the first article by the New York Times on June 13, 1971 caught the Nixon Administration completely by surprise. The Papers contained nothing adverse about the Nixon Administration itself, since the study concluded with the Johnson Administration, but there were three principal causes of concern:
Political Beast: Two-Year (Cotton Anniversary) Retrospective
- Coker, Gabe
- 30 April 2018

The following contains references to articles published by ModState over the past two years. If you don’t get it, then you didn’t read it. Tradition tells
Black History Month: Being About It
- DeViney, Jack
- 17 February 2018

Talking about what might’ve been and thinking about what used to be only goes so far. Certainly not one opposed to reminiscing, I was wracked with grief over the comments
The Living and The Dead: Dystopia as Pastime [or: “The Road to Megiddo”]
- DeViney, Jack
- 19 January 2018

If you’re awake and at all oriented to the world at large, you needn’t go far from the comforts of your mobile phone, laptop or television-hub to
Fabriquè en Babylon: Here There Be Monsters “Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you.” - Friedrich Nietzsche
- DeViney, Jack
- 15 December 2017

Someday, we will look back knowing that Donald Trump gave birth to the 21st century. In a time where life is cheap and peace a punchline from the footnotes
Political Beast: Police Procedures [or: “Gee, does this sound boring?”]
- Coker, Gabe
- 1 December 2017

When Political Beast decided to go back to the subject of police-community relations, we were a bit hesitant, since we’ve covered this pretty thoroughly in a former
Political Beast: Vietnam – Did People Actually Care?
- Coker, Gabe
- 14 October 2017
When I heard Ken Burns, rock star of documentary film, was releasing a new PBS documentary, I was, of course, excited. When I heard the subject was Vietnam, I was
EDITORIAL: Don’t Eat The Rich
- DeViney, Jack
- 21 September 2017
This becomes irresponsibility, this relentless notion of “progressives” that life can be perfectly equitable and fair if only the central (Federal)
Executive Completion: Trump’s Transgender Tweets
- Leary, Teresa
- 28 July 2017
On the anniversary of the Executive Order that desegregated the Armed Forces,
our commander-in-chief, President Donald J. Trump, sent the following three tweets:
EDITORIAL: The Obamacare Repeal Endgame(s)
- Wellein, Nate S.
- 18 July 2017

As I sit to write this article I still find myself struggling to understand the goal of the Senate GOP Health Care bill(s). Obviously, the overall ideology and goal is
Norway Announces U.S. Marines To Extend Stay
- Staff
- 21 June 2017

Stuttgart, Germany – Norway’s Minister of Defense announced today that U.S. Marines will continue rotational training and exercises in Norway through 2018.
“Our
“Doctors and Mahers and Sessions…oh MY…”
- Staff
- 19 June 2017
“There is a sort of excess that is interesting, don’t
Op-Ed: Abortion and The Status Quo
- Wellein, Nate S.
- 16 June 2017
In my lifetime, I haven’t seen the country more divided than today. Of course, this is relative and my clarity regarding current events in this country pre 1999
30 April, 2017: A Creed For All Seasons
- DeViney, Jack
- 13 June 2017
It’s not often in this foul year of our Lord, two-thousand seventeen, that any verbose armchair scribe lacks for subject matter worthy of dissecting. Yet with
Expect the Impossible
- Wellein, Nate S.
- 7 May 2017
In George Friedman’s forecast of the 21st century (“The Next 100 Year”) he wrote, “The old, New Left slogan ‘Be Practical,
Interview: Black History, POTUS Obama, Et al
- Green, Mr.
- 29 April 2017
DeViney: Mr. Green, from the outset, before I go getting carried away and forget, thank you, from the bottom of my heart and on behalf of the swashbucklers who comprise
Fabriquè en Babylon: Evil (Fifteen Years On)
- DeViney, Jack
- 12 April 2017

This was the opening sequence of a night no one in The Smith household had foreseen coming, but things
NeoSpeak: Flynn-again, Intel and Greatest Smokescreen of All Time(?)
- DeViney, Jack
- 1 April 2017
If one good turn truly deserves another (as the timeless axiom goes), then it’s no small feat that Washington D.C. manages to accomplish anything
SPECIAL: POTUS Trump’s Executive Order 6
- DeViney, Jack
- 24 March 2017
On 28 January, 2017, was issued the “Executive Order: Ethics Commitments by Executive Branch
With One-Year Anniversary the Event Horizon, ModState Embraces Smooth Transition into Year #2
- DeViney, Jack
- 20 March 2017
Not everyone foresaw just how thoroughly successful the first year of ModState would end up being on any given metric, let alone that it
Political Beast: Crossing The Lines With Trump and History
- Coker, Gabe
- 17 March 2017
No, no, we aren’t accusing anyone in the Trump administration of crossing any ethical, moral or legal lines here. Not in this particular article,
“Is It Just Us” – Fair & Thorough Aggregation Site for Black Americans (becomes friends with ModState)
- DeViney, Jack
- 12 March 2017

While we haven’t entered into the depth of discussion to which opportunity afforded
SPECIAL: POTUS Trump’s Executive Order 5
- DeViney, Jack
- 7 March 2017
On 27 January, 2016, came
Forgotten Flint: Crises Unabated
- Leary, Teresa
- 3 March 2017

As I began research on this article, I wondered what it would be like to go through what
Podcast Response to POTUS Trump’s Address to Joint Session of U.S. Congress
- DeViney, Jack
- 1 March 2017

In what is far and away our shortest podcast to date, Gabe Coker hosted an episode of his
SPECIAL: POTUS Trump’s Executive Orders 3 & 4
- DeViney, Jack
- 22 February 2017

From 25 January, 2017 is the third Executive Order of President Trump which is largely aimed at State and local (i.e., “Sanctuary Cities”) governments
SPECIAL: POTUS Trump’s Executive Orders 1 & 2
- DeViney, Jack
- 19 February 2017
In a moment of unintended humor, Richard M. Nixon said,
Neospeak: Hashtags for the #RebelWITHaCause
- DeViney, Jack
- 15 February 2017
While our pending press release and corporate strategy announcement with upstate New York’s OverWatch Productions LLC is very much
Fabriquè en Babylon: Let Us See The Legacy
- DeViney, Jack
- 9 February 2017

In one of his finer moments in repose, Mick Jagger remarked, “Only a madman or an actor would want to be President of The United States.” Well, Sir
Post-Inauguration Podcast: G. Coker & J. DeViney Part Two
- DeViney, Jack
- 4 February 2017

Do you remember the days when ModState was really OCD about every minute detail? Probably not, but I do and that’s
Post-Inauguration Podcast: G. Coker & J. DeViney Part One
- DeViney, Jack
- 1 February 2017

In a largely miserable effort, Gabriel Coker invites the managing editor of ModState back to his podcast to mixed results: Montana gets airtime without someone
SPECIAL: Open Letter to President Trump from Staff Writer Teresa Leary
- Leary, Teresa
- 21 January 2017
When I began to think about what I’d write in this letter, I paused briefly. Although I am an honest, outspoken person
ModState’s 1st Podcast of 2017 Part Three: Musings of a (largely-ignored) managing editor
- DeViney, Jack
- 17 January 2017

“If you can’t be on time, be early.” This and many other fine sayings have come to define the apex of my time in
Addendum: the 13th Amendment
- Coker, Gabe
- 13 January 2017
I am not in the business of film review. Our editorial staff here at ModState has established this as an uncompromising policy position.
ModState’s 1st Podcast of 2017 Part Two: Trump Campaign Surrogate Mitchell Tyner, Sr., Returns
- DeViney, Jack
- 11 January 2017

True to his sterling form as both an overt Southern gentleman coupled with being a tremendous financial
ModState’s 1st Podcast of 2017 Part One: Nogales County (AZ) Sheriff Tony Estrada Returns
- DeViney, Jack
- 11 January 2017

One of the most striking figures ever to’ve interacted with us here at ModState, Nogales County (Arizona) Sheriff Tony Estrada
Executive Completion: The Civil Rights Crises of Standing Rock
- Leary, Teresa
- 10 January 2017
In South Dakota, at Standing Rock, both public and private law enforcement agencies
As Wild Year Concludes, Board of Directors, Ed. Staff See Cause for Renewed Optimism
- DeViney, Jack
- 31 December 2016

As the New Year is preparing to force us all to live within the confines of 2017 for a whole year (selfish!), ModState LLC has continued to
Iwo Jima Timelapse Work from ModState’s In-House Visuals Guru
- DeViney, Jack
- 24 December 2016
…in all seriousness, my childhood friend, US Air Force veteran and the ModState graphic design director, Samuel J. Wheeler, has seen fit to share with the world the process that went into the replica he handmade (not scanned and printed it, no, no) for his father and if you’re a self-aware, halfway-literate member of civilization you’ve probably seen the infamous photograph and/or replica of the second flag-raising at Iwo Jima (the first flag-raising was not the incident made famous by the media, nor was Navy corpsman1 [combat medic] Bradley in the immortalized reenactment).
Regardless, the extent to which Mr. Wheeler went to so beautifully re-capture the original, uh, re-capturing as a gift for his father is beyond belief and you owe it to yourself to check out this short YouTube video and share it with your friends and enemies: they’ll thank you either way.
1 When the MSM (mainstream media) and their fellow Leftists all over the coastlines insult President George W. Bush (R-TX) and President-elect Donald J. Trump (X-NY)2 on the basis of intellect (or, as they allege, the lack thereof), just remember: our outgoing President, Barack H. Obama (D-IL), the Constitutional lawyer with very little regard for the actual text of the US Constitution3 (edumacated4 at that basket of depravity called something like “Harvard University” or some other s**t5), on more than one occasion did refer to a corpsman as a corpseman (as in a corpse and a man juxtaposed in the same set of syllables).
2 Recall the quote from Mick Jagger (circa. 1978) from one of the first articles to ever appear on ModState (“If you can’t take a joke, that’s too fucking bad”) because, yes, I am well aware the POTUS-elect should have his party signifier cited as (R-NY) and not as it appeared. If he were a movie, I don’t know that he’d have an “R” rating and so…y’see what I did there? Don’t like it? See the previously-mentioned quote from Sir Michael Philip Jagger. Don’t like it? Find the distinct “X” marker at the top right of your browser window and click it.
3 A POTUS who is okay with disagreement from the Legislative branch because they have a phone and a pen is: A) a big fan of the non sequitur (meaning “it does not follow” or move in linear or logically-sound progression) or B) studied Constitutional law because it’s the doctrine entrenched opposite of their…FRIENDS?! Yes, they studied it to know their true enemy, because they admire Communists like Saul Alinsky and embrace anti-capitalist concepts such as the Cloward–Piven strategy. Guess which one President Obama is?
4 Look, I’ve taken part in the ridicule of POTUS 43 (Jorge “Dubya” Booish) and Donald “Trump Means ‘Fart’ in England” Trump and do a mean impression of my favorite POTUS (Richard “Expletive Deleted” Nixon) so, yeah, when you’re the favorite Leftist intellectual of the Leftist Intellectual crowd (who believe[s] there’s no such think as an intellectual who isn’t a Leftist) and you mercilessly ridicule things you disagree while being a Democrat. “So what if he’s a Democrat?!” you demand. Well, let’s see, the Democratic Party: fought the post-Reconstruction, full implementation efforts aimed at truly ending slavery, fought to keep Jim Crow laws all while espousing progress BS like eugenics (the genetics’ pseudo-scientific study of the inferiority of blacks [among others]) and a hero of a racist thug who as POTUS is alleged (Ronald Kessler’s book
With New Episode of Podcast, ModState Ends Post-Election Break
- DeViney, Jack
- 13 December 2016
As the wise and reverent youth, the Prince formerly known as Artist once said, “Even the soldiers need a break sometimes.”
Executive Completion: Social Media in Journalism A Double-Edged Sword
- Leary, Teresa
- 26 November 2016

For the better and for the worse, social media has drastically altered the landscape of journalism. This article seeks to take a look at a few of the positive and negative consequences that modernity has brought. As well as reminding us that although the manner in which the public gains the news has changed, the end goal remains. Providing the truth to the American public. According to PEW research center, “As of early 2016, just two-in-ten U.S. adults often get news from print newspapers. This has fallen from 27% in 2013.” The research discovered that “Roughly two-thirds (64%) of U.S. adults use the site, and half of those users get news there — amounting to 30% of the general population.”
Many critics of social media find this fact terrifying. In his article titled An Alarming Number Of People Rely On Social Media For News, Damon Beres of The Huffington Post notes that social media “shows you what it thinks you’ll be interested in. The social network pays attention to what you interact with, what your friends share and comment on, and overall reactions to a piece of content, lumping all of these factors into an algorithm that serves you items you’re likely to engage with.” He goes on to explain that the problem with receiving news from such sites is that they create echo chambers. Essentially reverberating what each user already believes and likes. Offering a less likely plethora of distinct views that differ from their own. Human beings learn more information when offered all perspectives of the same subject in order to form a coherent opinion based on as many facts and sides as is possible. Echo chambers remove all perspectives.
To be fair to such sites, it is the human element that helps the algorithm form the echo chamber. People are less likely to hear multiple perspectives unless they allow their likes to go beyond what their comfort levels may inherently be. In his article Facebook Said Its Algorithms Do Help Form Echo Chambers. And the Tech Press Missed It, Zeynep Tufekci of The World Post notes that “Even as technology plays an increasingly important role in our lives, we lack critical, smart and informed coverage — with a few exceptions. We get more critical coverage of Apple’s newest watch then we do on important topics like on how algorithms which help shape our online experience.”
However, it is also important to note the positive aspects and abilities that modern social media can have. A myriad of experts, including Journalists, now have the ability to gain information on breaking stories faster than ever before. In 2011 during Hurricane Irene the Wall Street Journal used Foursquare’s tip lists feature to provide the locations of New York City evacuation centers. During an apartment shooting The Trentonian, a local newspaper in NJ, used Google Plus, Twitter, Facebook and community bloggers to report the story as it was occurring. With enough followers it actually becomes possible to debunk false information being put out to the public as well. These are examples that show that social media is a tool for uncovering as much information as possible if utilized appropriately.
Unfortunately, as Anthony Adornato, assistant Professor of Journalism at Ithaca College in New York points out, little or no specifics are in place to ensure that fact checking occurs before a story is published. Stating that, “Its commonplace that news outlets are relying on content that folks have shared, but not every newsroom has a policy regarding how to verify and authenticate this information.” Author Katharine Viner who wrote the article How technology disrupted the truth says it quite eloquently when she sums up the problem, “we are caught in a series of confusing battles between opposing forces: between truth and falsehood, fact and rumor, kindness and cruelty; between the few and the many, the connected and the alienated; between the open platform of the web as its architects envisioned it and the gated enclosures of Facebook and other social networks; between an informed public and a misguided mob.”
In an Article titled
It’s official: Most
ModState LLC Board of Directors Begins Taking Shape as Post-Election Transition Continues
- DeViney, Jack
- 24 November 2016

All good things come to an end, and with the 2016 POTUS Election mercifully coming to its (apparent) conclusion, ModState has sailed
Political Beast Podcast: “How He Won” – w/DJT’s Florida campaign magnate, Mr. Mitch Tyner
- Coker, Gabe
- 16 November 2016

The media got it wrong.
Why? We’re two days past the surprise election of Donald J. Trump as our President-Elect, so we should know by now why they got it wrong, right? But no, we don’t. Political Beast can’t explain this any better than anyone else…except when it comes to Florida. And maybe the rest of the country. And maybe the entire enchilada.
Guess that means we do have the answer. He-he.
Exclusives for a journalistic startup don’t come often, but maybe we got lucky, so enjoy: Mitch Tyner, the campaign head in Mississippi for the Trump campaign got called up to work a slightly more-important state (Florida) on August 22. And he spoke to Political Beast a day after his (and Trump’s) historic victory there. In Florida. Ready to learn a few important facts?
Going back to his primary run, Trump never had more than 75 paid staffers in the entire country. Ever. But almost 50,000 volunteers.
That’s volunteers in Florida. Alone.
So, how did He win? In case it isn’t becoming obvious, Trump beat Hillary at the ground game. Uh, what? We all know
SPECIAL: Election Day Update(s)
- DeViney, Jack
- 8 November 2016
Good evening (thus far): no mass reports of voter intimidation, no reports of Russian hacks (or any other hacks, for that matter) and with the first
Political Beast: And Then There Were…Three?
- Coker, Gabe
- 7 November 2016
This is a quick look at the way the battle sits as we begin the day that selects our next Commander in Chief. The electoral map as Political Beast sees it. And a potential
Executive Completion: Social Justice
- Leary, Teresa
- 2 November 2016

In the household I grew up in feminism was as much a part of the daily routine as was breathing. Perceptions about equality
Fabriquè en Babylon: Don’t Let “Them” Win
- DeViney, Jack
- 28 October 2016
I hearken back to hallowed antiquity (or the 2012 election season, anyway), about six months after meeting a fellow corpsman I had the honor to
Political Beast: “Shoot” versus “Shot”
- Coker, Gabe
- 26 October 2016

I’ve spent the last several weeks investigating the issue of police violence, specifically when it results in death. I’ve sat through difficult
Executive Completion: the Lesser of Two Evils is Still Evil
- Leary, Teresa
- 21 October 2016
![[cartoon from The Saturday Evening Post]](https://www.modstate.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/saturdayeveningpostdotcom.jpg)
“Democracy is two wolves and a lamb
voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!”
– Benjamin Franklin-
SPECIAL: POTUS Debate #3 Judge’s Ballot
- DeViney, Jack
- 19 October 2016

For what feels like the better part of an aeon, a near equally-endless array of the vile punditry and our hapless American citizenry have
SPECIAL: POTUS Debate #2 Judge’s Ballot
- DeViney, Jack
- 14 October 2016
“’Tawdry,’” my Uncle Zip began, “is the word for it, I believe.” The Donald arrived at the scene of the 2nd Presidential
Executive Completion: the Anti-Vote Election
- Leary, Teresa
- 12 October 2016
I am incredibly disheartened.
State of Mind: American (Part 2)
- Hughes, Anny
- 10 October 2016

This is a continuation of my previous article on being American that touched on some things that attack the American way of life both
Executive Completion: Aristocracy
- Leary, Teresa
- 5 October 2016
In each of the articles that I have written so far for ModState I have brought up America’s Founding Fathers. I’ve done so
SPECIAL: Diatribe – Are These Really Our Choices?
- Leary, Teresa
- 30 September 2016
Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump? Is the
SPECIAL: POTUS Debate Judge’s Ballot
- DeViney, Jack
- 28 September 2016
Just shy of a decade has elapsed since I
Executive Completion: Lobbying Run Riot
- Leary, Teresa
- 26 September 2016
![[image source: Everything-PR.com]](https://www.modstate.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Lobby-Everything-PRdotcom.jpg)
With the Presidential election
SPECIAL: Legal Voting Age
- Eldeen, Lilly
- 19 September 2016
Under normal circumstances, the age an American citizen is given the right to vote is eighteen years old. However, there is a minority
OP-ED
- Leary, Teresa
- 16 September 2016
America: Cultural Fondue
![[image courtesy of The New Orleans Film Society]](https://www.modstate.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/NewOrleansfilmsociety.jpg)
Growing up in New Orleans, Louisiana
Executive Completion: Campaign Finance
- Leary, Teresa
- 12 September 2016
My son started school this week. I sat down and went through all of his paperwork, compiling a list of what he would need for each class,
EDITORIAL
- DeViney, Jack
- 8 September 2016
Punishing Success Won’t Breed More Success
There exists a monstrous misunderstanding of the role of modern government, the central bank and,
State of Mind: American
- Hughes, Anny
- 2 September 2016
There are so many different ethnicities and life styles living in America and for some reason we feel the need to hyphenate certain ethnicities.
Executive Completion: Is The Electoral College the Will of the People or a Farce?
- Leary, Teresa
- 31 August 2016
Each time I think about going to vote this November I feel a curious mixture of pride and sadness. As an American,
Moor Tea, Less Koolaid: Agents Provocateurs for Liberty!
- Wilson, Dain
- 17 August 2016
Growing up in the neighborhoods of Philadelphia, PA,
SPECIAL: Two-Party System a Perversion of The Founder’s Intent
- Leary, Teresa
- 9 August 2016
Political beliefs are generally gained from different social experiences in a person’s life, beginning in childhood when one’s parents
Moor Tea, Less Koolaid: False Narrative or Collusive Commentary?
- Wilson, Dain
- 29 July 2016
Just in case you were wondering, all the Black folks voting for Trump, spoke
Fabriquè en Babylon: Bullets and “Brexit”
- DeViney, Jack
- 22 July 2016

Last night, tonight or any night, as I watch the remainder tick down on what remains of “this” twenty-four hours I am watching the unfolding of a generational struggle
SPECIAL: “The Struggle” of All American Military Vets
- Shockley, Brandon M.
- 9 July 2016
I am writing this article to just say a few things. I do not expect any changes around the country or a million people to read this. I only strive to
Moor Tea, Less Koolaid: Cup Runneth Over (Is America Blooddrunk Enough?)
- Wilson, Dain
- 8 July 2016
![[COURTESY OF: WBCO.com] Dallas police officers stand in a line near the site of shootings in downtown Dallas, early Friday, July 8, 2016. Snipers opened fire on police officers, police said; some of the officers were killed. (AP Photo/LM Otero)](https://www.modstate.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Dallas-July-WBCOdotcom-300x183.jpg)
Before I could submit this editorial, news broke of shooting of 11 police officers in Dallas, TX. The officers were protecting the demonstrators
ModState Marks Podcast Debut With “Political Beast,” Sheriff Tony Estrada
- DeViney, Jack
- 2 July 2016

In a bit of a late showing (on the part of management), everything came together in the eleventh hour for Gabe Coker and
The Lost Cause of The GOP & The Jewish Vote in 2016
- Grey, Dorian
- 18 June 2016

They haven’t, as a majority, voted Republican for president in any year since the Reagan administration. That’s more than thirty years ago!
Sadly, U.S. Jews as a group are not likely to switch to voting Republican in 2016 either. The most significant reasons why include:
- Steadfast dedication to the Democratic Party.
- Commitment to liberal causes, especially on social issues. Further, most Jews in the U.S. do not rank support for Israel high on their list of political issues.
- Belief that Donald Trump is racist against Latinos and Muslims.
Jews have a historic commitment to the Democratic Party, and many vote exactly as their parents voted even though the parties have significantly changed over time. What’s more, Jewish population centers tend to be in heavily Democratic areas [as] the highest Jewish populations in the U.S. are New York, New Jersey, Florida, Massachusetts, and California (source: http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/usjewpop.html).
Last month, a Gallup survey was released, and its eye-opening (source:
Political Beast: Immigration Insanity
- Coker, Gabe
- 16 June 2016
We quit for two days, just to prove we could do it. Or maybe we didn’t have a choice. It doesn’t matter. What matters is we kept off of it for five more days, so we’re clear.

Yes, I’m making an analogy to addiction that relates to this column, but look, it’s important. Because of the slaughter in Orlando, we’ve had a seven-day reprieve from Trump’s rantings about a wall. First two days, we quit hearing by accident. The following five mercifully silent days have offered an opportunity to you and to me to consider (free of flaming rhetoric) the issue of illegal immigration to the United States of America. I don’t know how to lead into this, so I’ll end the bull-crap analogies and get to the point. My interview this week involves two sheriffs. One you [do] know and one you should know.

The first is Sheriff Joe Arpaio, the most well-known [law enforcement official] in this country. Yeah, yeah, the sheriff in Arizona, the guy that detains more Mexicans than any other, makes his inmates wear pink in the Yard, is reviled by mainstream media and is constantly being sued by the ACLU.
Yes, him.
The second is Sheriff Tony Estrada, who lives and works just a few Arizona counties down from Arpaio.

He is the sheriff, in fact, of the southernmost county in the U.S. that shares a border with Mexico. More than any in the country, this is the man that stands on the frontline of the battle (if that’s what it is) over illegal immigration. All of the facts, innuendo, or suggestions I place in this column are based on (and informed by) Sheriff Estrada.
In Nogalez, there are approximately 40,000 residents. Just across the border in Nogalez, Mexico, there are considerably more. Prior to 1994, there were around 70 border agents in the entirety of Santa Cruz County, AZ (where Nogalez is located). When I say there are “considerably more” residents on the Mexican side, I mean ten times more. As in 400,000.
Before we get too far into this interview, let’s go back to 1995 for just a sec. Back then, a member of the Clinton administration recommended the building of a barrier to keep out undesirables. This resulted in an unpredicted reaction: the construction of at least 114 known tunnels underneath said wall. Also, violent crime, especially against women, increased exponentially due of the need among descent potential immigrants to gain professional (read: “criminal”) help getting across the border. Sheriff Estrada put it very bluntly: “Mexico, our friendly neighbor, contains a population that will find a way in. Wall or no wall. The fallout is our fault.”
At this point in the interview, I brought up a question my 8-year-old daughter asked when she overheard me playing back my interview with Sheriff Estrada, while I was taking notes. She heard my questions to Tony Estrada about the “Wall,” and asked, “Daddy, I thought we took down that wall.” Hehe, “That Wall.” I was understandably proud of an 8 year-old knowing about the Berlin Wall, “The Wall” of my childhood. Obviously, I explained the difference to her because it does matter. Fortunately, I thought to ask about the difference during my interview with Sheriff Estrada prior to my daughter’s questions. Incidentally, after a discussion with my daughter about the history of the Berlin Wall, I began to explain the motivation for and purpose of what we’ll call Trump’s Wall. I won’t bore you with the efforts of a parent with a deep background in political study attempting to discuss immigration policy with a wide-eyed 8-year-old, but the experience informed my examination of Sheriff Estrada’s thoughts on the matter.
Sheriff Estrada pointed out that the current wall plays a very small part in border security. Border agents, and their surveillance, are the primary deterrents to illegal immigration. In fact, contrasting the palsy 70 agents in ’95, there are currently 1,000 agents on the border in Santa Cruz County alone. Why so many? And why is a wall not the answer? I pointed out to Estrada that one of the most secure borders in the world is the border between Mexico and Honduras. Obviously, the radically poor Hondurans are still able to find a way into Mexico, Estrada pointed out.
Then, he took to the pulpit.
Sheriff Estrada preached a sermon to me about suffering, addiction, kidnapping, rape, murder, extortion, families torn apart and about unification. In this industry, it’s best not to become emotionally involved with your subject. At this point, however, I admit this was difficult. Thus, I I turned to numbers and facts (for better or for worse; we’ll get back to the emotional stuff). After questioning him, Estrada said the primary reason to support a porous border is the importance of free trade and [that] this benefits the U.S. even more than Mexico. Also, the more we try to lock down the border, the more it costs, and let’s just say Mexico ain’t the one paying for it. To bring it a little closer to home, says Estrada, Santa Cruz County is footing quite a bit of the bill. And this bill involves capturing and processing much more than Mexican migrants. Cubans, Hondurans, Venezuelans and, a surprising statistic: almost 30% of migrants coming in illegally are from Asian or Middle Eastern countries.
But none of this is the problem according to Tony Estrada.
Drugs. In the 1960s, people immigrated to America from Mexico but almost no one swam the Rio Grande. There are plenty of ports on the coasts of both countries. Why wade across the river with a backpack when you can pack all of your belongings and book (legal) passage on a freightliner? What changed? Drugs. Once the [U.S.] Federal government got a hard-on for narcotics dealers, all bets were off. Any country seen as a source or threat of a source for hard drugs was censured and immigration from these nations was severely restricted, and this bias continues. The sheriff pointed out the irony of the idea of building a wall that could hurt us economically while entertaining the idea of a ban on people from countries that could actually (and actively wish to) harm us through terrorism. Agree or not, I do find that funny.
This columnist is not going to take a position on whether particular substances should or should not be legal, or whether ending prohibition of certain narcotics would help the immigration/cartel violence problem. I’ll simply move on to Sheriff Estrada’s solution, such as it is: Love. I’m not trying to solve America’s immigration dilemma in this column, but I got an interview with the most impactful person in this country when it comes to this issue.
The answer, according to Estrada, is love. Understanding the needs and addictions and poverty of people on both sides of the border, and [then] helping them. Talking with community leaders (and the cartels) on both sides of the border, helping local politicians feel safe speaking out and working with their enemies. The primary problem, he says, is that there is no real legitimate immigration system now. He told me the story of a Mexican woman who went to college in the U.S., married an American, and had a job offer from a major technology firm in North Carolina. The Naturalization Service denied her visa, and it took she and her American husband 3 years and $30,000 in legal fees to finally earn her a visa to the United States. Estrada argues, again, that there is no reasonably sane immigration system currently in place in this nation. Above all, the vast majority of people do not have the resources to legally immigrate here.
Think what you will, but regardless, thus ended the interview.
And oh, that other sheriff? The famous one? The one who wouldn’t return my (multiple) calls? Sheriff Joe Arpaio is known as being on the forefront of the fight against illegal immigration, and the drug trade. He has a thankless and dangerous task, being the sheriff of the Arizona county that boasts having the two most popular destinations in the state for illegal drugs and illegal human traffic. A member of Sheriff Arpaio’s staff agreed to have a frank conversation with me, so off the record she (or was it a “she?”) was visibly shaking by the time we were finished. During this conversation, she admitted Sheriff Arpaio was uncomfortable talking about the failures in Maricopa County’s numbers since his election and that he often questioned, out loud, his tactics and their effectiveness. This column is not intended to be an opinion piece. I like interviewee’s opinions and I like facts. Santa Cruz County, AZ is as close to Mexico as you can get, without being in the place. Cartel violence inside our southern neighbor is out of control. There hasn’t been a murder in Santa Cruz County in 6 years.
There are a lot of opinions about which direction to take on illegal immigration. The only [widespread] agreement is that “something has to be done.” No. It can just stay the same.
A Jew Complains: We Millenials
- Borger, Corey
- 15 June 2016
[Note from the Exec. Ed: “This article missed our own promotional deadline, a timetable of 9pm Pacific, because of issues with the Wi-Fi on
Fabriquè en Babylon: It’s Cool to Know Nothing
- DeViney, Jack
- 13 June 2016
It wouldn’t have been long, I’d figured, before my tour of the Cruz White House would bring me peering into the abyss. I’d’ve
House GOP launch new website in Election Year Agenda Rollout
- DeViney, Jack
- 7 June 2016

Today marks the official launch of “A Better Way” by The House GOP, a six point policy publication highlighting the most dire needs
California Primary Awaits Clinton, Sanders and Trump
- DeViney, Jack
- 7 June 2016

While this is going to be a bit of an ongoing event (as of time of starting this post it is 03:44 in San Diego), the analytics
NeoSpeak: Corey Borger and The Millenials
- Staff
- 4 June 2016

We the millennials of this great nation are succumb to the flaws of human nature. Our red, white, and blue guts remind us how hungry we are for the truth.
Fabriquè en Babylon: The Generation Who Sold The World
- DeViney, Jack
- 25 May 2016
“I’d hate America if I didn’t love it so much.”
Allow me to explain. Looking at my surroundings, my “office” (occupying a fair portion of the
NOT trending: U.S. Rep Devin Nunes does not clarify remarks (“…if you actually wanna do real work…”)
- DeViney, Jack
- 24 May 2016
Rep. Devin Nunes presented a rather stark tone of disdain for those in favor of spending cuts: “If you want to do phony work and if you
Blind Consent: A Libertarian View to a Cause
- Warfield, Byron
- 15 May 2016
So many people are just content in the idea of the political spectrum being strictly confined to the ‘left/right paradigm’ that it’s really quite
NeoSpeak: Al Capone’s Vault > Prince’s Vault
- Staff
- 10 May 2016
Jonathan D. DeViney: “Prince’s love songs were about as romantic as a pay toilet. And now, y’know we’re gonna have to listen to just how much of a genius he was…”
ModState adds two to editorial staff
- Staff
- 9 May 2016
NeoSpeak
- Staff
- 6 May 2016

DeViney, Jonathan D.: Our daily post feature, rather than being called “Shorts,” is to be entitled
Blind Consent: The Hypocrisy of The Boycott
- Warfield, Byron
- 6 May 2016
Several recording artists have boycotted performances in North Carolina and Mississippi as what began (amongst the overwhelming majority of people that
State of Mind: What’s Next?
- Hughes, Anny
- 5 May 2016
With the ever more present awareness and now acceptance of
Tricky Dick, The Donald and The Tie
- DeViney, Mike
- 2 May 2016
I was born into a working class, white family from western Pennsylvania. They were Republicans who viewed the New Deal with disdain, so
Political Beast: Brutal Reporting
- Coker, Gabe
- 15 April 2016
So, it isn’t what you think. It definitely isn’t what I thought it would be, but this is what ended up happening
Blind Consent: New Eyes on Old Conflict
- Warfield, Byron
- 14 April 2016
Until about two years ago, half of my lineage was a mystery to me. mere guessing and wonderment. The scenarios and possibilities that have run through
A Week Brutal in Demands and Short on Rewards Ends in the Addition of Three to the Editorial Staff
- Staff
- 10 April 2016
As the upheaval of a chaotic week seemed as though it was about to simmer down, ModState executive editor Jonathan D. DeViney opted
Blind Consent: The Mortifying Picture From the Ghost of POTUS’ Future
- Warfield, Byron
- 8 April 2016
“April Fools’!” reads a meme showing the face of the GOP’s front runner, Donald Trump. Liberals galore opine
Q&A With a “White Civil Rights Leader”: does Euro pride constitute white supremacism?
- Staff
- 8 April 2016
Late last month, I had the opportunity to sit down with someone who might seem straight out of civics class to all sorts of people. Those political
State of Mind: The Americans
- Hughes, Anny
- 7 April 2016

We’ve already looked into the state of mind of the GOP candidates. Now I would like to take a look at the state of mind of America, the people of America.
The #NeverTrump Crowd is Wrong
- Braswell, Jimmy
- 31 March 2016

Know that I supported Scott Walker. In my mind, his successful union-busting, trimmed-down budget in a blue state offered a blueprint to turn around this country. Alas, I didn’t have my way and carried on with supporting other candidates. I’ve observed for the most part, watching as the field narrowed down to the three we have now; one of those being the firebrand Donald Trump.
The Donald has caused quite the controversy within GOP intra-politics. Some say he’s the Devil. Some think he’s the second coming of Christ. I take neither side. I’m not particularly fond of Trump, but I’m not totally convinced he is Lucifer reincarnated.
The purpose of this article is to address the former and not the latter, particularly in light of Trump’s likely nomination. There’s enough anti-Trump propaganda on the Internet (just look at Twitter).
You have the likes of GOP quasi-elites like Erik Erickson, Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro, <insert another pundit’s name who has never accomplished a damned thing in his or her life besides write articles and condemn those who don’t agree with their opinions> who are forming a #NeverTrump coalition with a keyboard as their weapon of choice. Along the way, they’ve managed to insult Trump voters, implying that “Trumpkins” are stupid, racist, blah, blah, blah. You know, the same tactic the Left uses against the GOP: labeling people.
Then you have the GOP elites. These names include elected officials like newcomer Ben Sasse, Lindsey Graham, Mitt Romney; professional pundits like Karl Rove, Stephen Hayes, and Bill Kristol; and lobbyists like Paul Singer, Ricketts, etc, who want to further their own interests by having politicians in their back pockets.
This combined brain trust of pundits and elites, all of whom are completely ignorant to the GOP base’s anger, are holding secret tinfoil hat meetings in an effort to further their #NeverTrump campaign. Rather than allow the plebian GOP voters their say, the GOP bourgeoisie are mounting a preemptive strike. They hope to install someone they all agree on, because they’re apparently smarter than those racist, bigoted, low-information, Confederate flag-waving Trump voters.
A side note: Most of the Trump voters I know are successful businessmen who don’t view politics as a hobby or a career. They’re all common sense people who are tired of politics as usual. I don’t expect the Beltway crowd to understand them. The likes of Erickson and Sasse have never put their tails on the line by signing a commercial lease or loan, had to make payroll or, you know, run a damned business. But these people are morons according to Erickson & Company.
Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe we should listen to those who talk down upon us from the ivory tower.
I’m certain that the same GOP quasi-elites and GOP bourgeoisie would absolutely refuse to support the likes of Romney and McCain with the same veracity. We won’t talk about how Romney supported government-mandated healthcare, was pro-abortion (including donating to Planned Parenthood) and supported bans on firearms. Nor will I mention how McCain is pro-mass immigration/amnesty, called Christians “agents of intolerance,” supported the disastrous NAFTA, claimed that overturning Roe vs. Wade would lead to more illegal abortions, and voted for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
I’m also certain that the above dead-enders would organize a similar #AntiTrump campaign to stop the likes of Bush. You know, they were the same family who combined expanded entitlements (hello, Medicare prescriptions), raised taxes, instituted the federally-mandated No Child Left Behind, added economic-stifling regulations to the tune of $100 million a year, and inflated the federal budget by over $800 billion. They also gave us Justice Breyer and Chief Justice Roberts.
There’s more…a lot more.
I don’t intend to praise Trump. As I said, I have my reservations about the man. I agree with some of his policies, others not so much. I also consider some of his actions morally reprehensible. Then again, people like Franklin, JFK, Obama, Cleveland, Nixon, Hoover, the list goes on and on, were influential in this country. Washington isn’t a place where saints thrive. Who the Hell am I to judge? Even Saul had his good days.
No, I intend to proffer a reason to vote for Trump this November. My only hope is the reader keeps an open mind.
First, let’s look at logic.
I want to stop Hillary Clinton above all else. An individual who has abused her office, causing the loss of American lives, and was involved with something called the Whitewater Scandal doesn’t deserve to represent the Red, White, and Blue. Hell no. The memory of those bare-footed, near-hypothermic bastards who crossed the Delaware River in the thick of winter deserve better.
The GOP quasi-elite and GOP bourgeoisie would have you think otherwise. Those pasty-skinned theorists who sit behind a desk all day would rather you fall on the sword this November by voting for the unicorn third-party candidate than help elect Trump. Their reasoning? Hillary would somehow be better because Trump’s policies are just terrible.
Let’s talk about the real result of a magical third-party candidate: Hillary will win.
What does a Hillary win mean for us? First, it most certainly cements a pro-abortion, anti-2A, pro-entitlement, pro-affirmative action SCOTUS for the near future. How does this compare to a Trump victory?
The arguments that I hear are that Trump will nominate a liberal justice. Why? How? Is there any concrete proof of this? Rather than take a chance on Trump, the anti-Trumpkin is vehemently against this idea. To put it bluntly: The anti-Trumpkins definitely want to lose rather than take a chance. It’s like that kid in little league who refused to swing at strike three. They simply don’t want to try. It’s an asinine and backwards way of thinking. It also leads to my greater point about Trump.
How or why doesn’t this super awesome brain trust think outside the box? It’s so obvious it’s apparent. If our GOP leaders in Congress are the brainiacs and tactical geniuses they claim to be, how come they’re incapable of thinking like strategists?
Play to Trump’s ego. It at least gives us a fighting chance. The man’s head is as big as Everest. You play to him. Let’s take the SCOTUS for example. We’re all worried about that.
Rather than let Trump zigzag his way through the selection process, you preemptively strike a deal with him. You say, “President Trump, to really chisel out your legacy for years to come, we think you should nominate this judge/intellectual.” It’s not rocket science. You can take a page out of Trump’s playbook and own the man’s ego like he claims to own the banks.
I understand the argument my good friend Brian Griffiths makes about down ticket issues, but this should be the job of the local and state GOP operations. If you’re a good enough representative, you’ll get elected. That’s how Republicans manage to get elected in heavily Democrat districts.
Should we talk about Hillary’s also-possible paths of destruction? How about raising the minimum wage? How about raising taxes? How about more business-crushing regulations? Raising short-term capital gains? “Free” college? How about further expansion of Obamacare? Another housing crisis because she wants to allow Fannie and Freddie to insure jumbo loans? The list goes on and on.
And with no sign of Republican-controlled Congress stopping any of Obama’s initiatives, why would they stop Hillary’s?
This is all apparently a-ok with Erickson, Sasse and friends.
Let’s move onto Trump’s main policy points, at least the more controversial. I’ll attempt to be succinct on each, as it would take me hours to describe each. You’ll get the point.
I’ll start with the two most controversial.
Immigration: This is the genesis of the useful idiots labeling Trump as a racist. Why? He dared mention the idea of temporarily restricting Muslim immigration. You’d think he was the first candidate/elected official to advocate such a measure. You’d also be wrong.
Both parties have adopted restrictive immigration policies in the past. There’s a difference though [in that] Trump’s policy is based on a culture, not race.
One of the most important jobs of the president is national security. There’s no doubt something is wrong in the Islamic community abroad. ISIS and the Syrian crisis is an example. Allowing mass Syrian immigration into the country will increase the chances of an ISIS-led attack. Even the experts agree. It’s common sense to curtail this, and it’s a conservative position.
Also, look at the mass-immigration of able-bodied Muslim men into Europe. It won’t take long for you to find stories about rapes of children and women. Why are there politically correct “cultural understanding” classes?
I don’t want to get into the weeds of a policy debate as this article is about the demonizing of Trump rhetoric. However, I would point to the recent Pew Survey about Islam and Sharia. Again, this is about culture.
Pew Research conducted a poll three years ago about this very fact. Among those countries in the Middle East-North Africa corridor, anywhere between 29% (Lebanon) to 91% (Iraq) claimed Sharia Law should be the law of the land. South Asia was even more startling, with 82% of respondents in Bangladesh, 84% in Pakistan, and 89% in Afghanistan agreeing.
This isn’t across the board. Look at areas with much greater exposure to Western Legal Tradition and culture. Much, much lower. See for yourself.
More importantly, anywhere between 29% (Morocco) and 74% (Egypt) claim that Sharia Law should apply to Muslims and Non-Muslims.
Now, what does Sharia Law entail? In the Middle East and North Africa, anywhere between 44% (Tunsia) to 76% (Palestinian territory) of Muslims claiming that Sharia should be the law support cutting off hands of thieves and robbers. How about stoning as a punishment for adultery? Again, the highest support comes from Middle-East North Africa region and South Asia. It ranges anywhere from 44% (Tunsia) to 85% of Sharia-loving Afghanis. Even better: taking the life of someone who abandons Islam is supported from Egypt (88%) to Afghanistan (70%).
Think about it: In a country like Afghanistan, 89% said Sharia should be law of the land. Among that 89% (9 in 10) 61% state that Sharia should apply to both Muslims and Non-Muslims. That’s about 5 in 10 Afghanis – 50% of the total population. Of that 50% of the population, 81% believe in chopping of arms of thieves, 85% claim that adulterers should be stoned to death, and 79% claim you should die if you convert. That’s 4 in 10 Muslims who want Non-Muslims to suffer these harsh sentences. That’s insane! Sorry if I don’t want my daughter exposed to that barbaric nonsense.
Unlike natural-born American Muslims who appreciate life outside of Sharia, those from certain areas of this world don’t think like us. Allowing unfettered mass-immigration will have grave consequences. I would guide the reader to Theodore Dalrymple’s book Our Culture, What’s Left of It about how Muslim immigrants cannot divorce their ideology from the government. Look at the Islamic communities in Paris. Closer to home, look no further than Somali gangs in Minnesota. That’s just a microcosm of what can happen in this country.
If temporarily Muslim immigration from hot spots is a racist platform, then Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Kasich, hell, the majority of the field are racists as well.
In a broader sense, how about Trump’s “build that wall” proposal? This is where Sasse, Erickson & Co. and the rest of the deadenders start using a tactic of the Left. They’re claiming a few knucklehead “alt-right racists” or whatever they’re called, hate “Mexicans,” whereas the greater good is being ignored. Once again, this argument is about culture, not race.
There’s a multitude of reasons for real immigration reform and strong borders. This ranges from the control of diseases we have contained in this country to curtailing gangs and the transport of heroin (illegal immigrants account for 90% of heroin trafficking in America).
The average illegal immigrant has a 10th grade education. Half of unlawful immigrants are headed by an individual with less than a high school degree. That’s not good. They’re a burden on an already bloated budget. The average illegal immigrant receives about $25K in benefits while only paying about 10K in taxes. That’s a net loss of 15K! If you aggregate those numbers together among all illegal immigrants, they create a deficit of $54.5 billion dollars.
Finally, since certain cultures think it’s perfectly fine to have sex with a twelve year-old, what about the absurd amount of child rape around the border. More than 2,000 sex offenders are deported every year in Texas alone. Illegal immigrants sexually assaulted nearly a thousand Texan children over a course of three years. Since when did building the wall become a racist policy? It’s mind numbing that we would rather refrain from offending someone than protecting our own children. Yet, Trump is racist and a bigot, along with all of his followers.
Trump wants to bring the best and the brightest back. I would equate this to a point system akin to Australia and New Zealand. The pro-immigration crowd claims this is racist. At least we’re in good company with down under.
Sorry, the deadenders lose me on this. I don’t see how this is racist. I don’t see how looking out for the security and the economic stability of the country has anything to do with it. [It’s] horrible that many on the Right don’t see this.
Let’s move on to trade policy: I love economics.
Trump is being attacked for his proposed 45% tariff on Chinese goods. Some websites who have a clear bias against Trump claim that this would devastate the economy, send us into a recession, and that a trade deficit is actually good for the economy.
Free trade is wonderful if it’s balanced. It becomes an issue when trade agreements allow one country to manipulate the agreement by purposefully devaluing their currency, thereby making it more beneficial for one country to import the cheaper goods. This is what China, along with other emerging markets, are doing because of their constant borrowing in an attempt to catch up with the modern world. They are essentially selling of their goods at a discount in order to increase exports and keep unemployment low.
What does this practice cause for the US?
According to University of Maryland Professor Peter Morici, the trade deficit with China grew $25 billion in 2015, killing 200,000 American jobs. US manufacturing employment growth is particularly hit hard, and has slowed by up to 30%.
Professor Morici also uses another example: the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement. Since 2012, imports from Korea have risen more than exports, increasing the trade deficit by $16 billion and destroying 130,000 American jobs.
As a whole, The US trade deficit is about $500 billion a year and costs 4 million jobs. Staggering. There is nothing liberal about protecting American jobs, particularly those in manufacturing.
Thus, Donald Trump threatens a 45% tariff on Chinese goods. What happens? The powers that be gasp and claim the US economy will fall apart.
You wonder if any of them ever heard of the Overton Window? Trump opened it just enough for Cruz, Kasich, and Rubio to start talking about unbalanced trade. Hell, Cruz even backed down from TPP (a whole different debate about sovereignty and the right of Congress to approve treaties). Oh, and TPP will most certainly open the door for more currency manipulation – fun for those not in the manufacturing sector.
Does Donald Trump really think a 45% tariff will work? Doubt it. Does he think a threat will work? If he studied President Reagan, I think he’d conclude that it would.
This will make some “conservatives” head spin.
For those of you who claim to be Reagan experts but never really studied his policies, you might be surprised to know that Ronald Reagan praised free trade but was really a protectionist. Take for example in 1981 when Ronald Reagan imposed a 45% tariff on Japanese motorcycles.
I’ll let that number sink in for a moment.
That’s not the end. Reagan also raised tariffs on Canadian lumber and cedar shingles, imposed a 100% tariff on $300 million worth of Japanese electronics, and threatened and forced Japan to voluntary accept restraints on auto exports after threatening a veto. There’s more. There’s so much more.
You get my point. If you’re attacking Trump’s trade rhetoric, you can’t praise Reagan. You’d be a hypocrite.
Before we move, I’d encourage the reader to think about other aspects of trade. What else could it mean for the country?
I mentioned a little earlier about one of the president’s most important jobs being national security. In their book Balanced Trade, Richman, Richman, and Richman found a statistically significant correlation between balance of trade and national power. Those countries with balanced trade had an increase in national material capabilities, while those with an unfavorable balance saw a decrease in national power.
Protecting our country is a conservative value.
I’d also like to point out the first two policies – protective tariffs and restrictive immigration – were adopted by one of the greatest conservative presidents ever to grace the Oval Office: Calvin Coolidge.
How about a quick look at other objections the #NeverTrump crowd has?
“He’s going to kill children”: There’s something called Kool-Aid which you should drink it if you think he’s going to kill children. Again, he’s opening the Overton Window? It’s ridiculous to even take this idea seriously.
Abortion: If you’re not going to vote for Trump because he’s pro-abort, then you should’ve never voted for McCain or Romney. Period. It’s hypocritical to give Romney, a former pro-choicer, a pass on this issue and not Donald Trump. “But he’s going to fund Planned Parenthood.” He’s using this tactic to appeal to single women – a group the GOP needs to start winning back. He also clarified that he won’t fund Planned Parenthood if they continue to perform abortions.
Look, I’m about as pro-life as you can get, but I’m also willing to give Donald Trump the benefit of the doubt and not demonize his past statements. I did the same for McCain. I did the same for Romney. I’ll do it for Trump. I also look at the alternative and what she will do for abortion “rights.”
He’s donated to Democrats: This is a complete joke. The only people who care about who an individual donates to are those inside the political bubble. Period. Most businesspersons I know have donated to both parties. Why? Access. They’re not political ideologues, and they don’t follow every vote of a politician. Trump might be different if he’s an ideologue, someone like a George Soros who donates exclusively to Democrats (sans Kasich), but he’s not. He’s actually supported Republican presidents in the past, including George H. and Reagan. I don’t buy this argument. I look at it more of a talking point for the vehemently anti-Trump crowd. If you’re so against Trump donating to Democrats, then maybe you should stop using Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
Wants government to run health care akin to Canada/England: This is the most laughable criticism. Critics claim that Trump’s past statements about England’s health care system show he’s pro-big government. These same critics ignore Romney’s past actions, particularly his installment of Romneycare in Massachusetts. If we’re being totally fair (and this might shock a few people), government-mandated healthcare was (the conservative think-tank) Heritage Foundation’s idea. What about Bush expanding Medicare with his prescription drug program? That doesn’t get discussed.
Trump doesn’t want government run healthcare. He wants competition. I know the idea is hard to swallow for some, but he’s made it clear several times. Again, we gave a pass to Romney and Bush, but we’re demonizing Trump.
I could make the same comparisons between several other areas the #NeverTrump deadenders make and past GOP candidates, including eminent domain, taxes, weapons ban, etc. You can easily research and find that Trump is very similar to those the #NeverTrump crowd have supported in the past.
This brings me to my final issue. It revolves around this whole idea that Trump is vulgar and racist. Look, I don’t fault someone for choosing to vote for someone else in the primary. That’s fine. That’s not what this piece is about. But if you’re not going to vote for Trump because he’s both vulgar and supposedly a racist (he’s not), then you’re letting your emotions get to you.
On the vulgarity: I simply don’t care. As I stated earlier in this piece, show me a white knight in Washington, and I’ll show you a unicorn. Yes, Trump is vulgar at times, and he’s extremely non-PC. I’m ok with the non-PC stuff. I simply don’t care. As far as vulgarity? That argument is a joke. It seems these days that a news cycle doesn’t go by without a politician being indicted or bought out by special interests. Yet, the #NeverTrump crowd would remain silent on these people, maybe even supporting some.
The list includes Representative Grimm in New York, former House Speaker John Boehner, former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell, Senator Marco Rubio, the list goes on and on. There’s so much corruption in Washington on both sides of the aisle that it’s hard to take seriously any Trump criticism about him being vulgar. Why didn’t I include the aforementioned activities? It adds more shock value when you start digging on these people.
At least with Trump it’s the devil I know.
On the racist/violent rhetoric: Trump isn’t a racist. His violent rhetoric is overblown. The media will point to him not disavowing David Duke. He disavowed him several times before that Sunday interview. That’s not an honest criticism.
As far as his supporters? They’re angry. They’ve been forgotten thanks to Washington. Democrats pander to the #BlackLivesMatter, immigrant, minority, government babies crowd. Republicans seem to care about big businesses and investment bankers. Who is forgotten? The demonized working class, the same people who lose manufacturing jobs in order to “stimulate our economy.”
Sorry, this is MY family. Though I hate to use labels, I’ll play by the rules. The working class have watched their jobs evaporate. It’s easy for the #NeverTrump crowd to look down upon these people while they punch away at their keyboards, thinking that they are ignorant, that they don’t have a right to be upset, that Trump (who speaks to their anger) is an imbecile and therefore they’re imbeciles as well.
Let me remind the reader that those imbeciles make up a majority of our military. They are the sons and daughters, the fathers and mothers who end up feeding our armed forces. While the #NeverTrump warriors mash away and continue to write articles, they don’t see how broken the middle class is with their wages having been reduced by $4,000 since 2000. You don’t think they have a right to be angry? Sorry but they damned well do. And if you think they’re racist because they believe in something most have long since forgotten, go pound sand. Really. Pound sand. They’ve made more sacrifices in a week than policy wonks will ever make in a lifetime.
Trump is their outlet. I take no issue with this.
Instead, the #NeverTrump crowd would rather facilitate a Hillary Clinton election, the same person who:
- Was terminated for unethical behavior while investigating Watergate.
- Involved
The Barrister for The One-Third
- DeViney, Jack
- 11 March 2016
Christopher Bridges: Man, it has been a Hell of a ride. I could tell so many stories of those years between then and now. Between car wrecks, jail terms, finding love, losing love, moving three or four times, it has just been wild. The constant has been music. Anywhere I have been, anyone I have been around, it has always the same. A steady diet of Willie Nelson, Van Halen, Led Zeppelin, Conway Twitty, Black Sabbath and Frank Sinatra. That is the secret. Lots of newer folks to the music scene don’t have respect for the older acts these days. You wouldn’t have any modern metal without Sabbath, no modern rock without Zep and Van Halen, no pop music without Ole Blue Eyes. The country I see as a split, you have this god-awful style of pop country that has been put to the front of modern country radio and that style I see as coming from the Conway Twitty, George Straight, Garth Brooks line. Then you have acts like Hank III, Unknown Hinson, and other more outlaw country musicians that you can draw a straight line to from Willie Nelson, Merle Haggard and David Allen Coe.
I digress though. It has been years since our initial meeting. Also we met in the spring of ‘04 at JCJC (Jones County Junior College). You kept saying that I needed to grow a pompadour. I kept telling you that you were full of shit. Man, we were like brothers. Joined at the hip almost. Time keeps rolling forward and we keep getting older I guess. I look back fondly on those days though. A bottle of whiskey, singing and playing by that piano at your family’s home in Hattiesburg. Those were the days.

DeViney: Obviously there is a lot of misperception amongst the general public about the Church of Satan. In all fairness to freedom of religion, speech & assembly (each in their own right) I think it’d be nice if you’d go ahead and cut through the fat for us all: you’re not praying whilst laying on a pentagram drawn in goat’s blood, dining on human adrenal glands and secretly branding your cats with an insidious “666”. So could you describe some of the major points of your faith and what it means to you as a red-blooded American man?
Bridges: While the Church of Satan is probably the most recognizable Satanic organization worldwide, it is one of the few that I am not a member of. I am a member of The Satanic Temple, which is a non-theistic religious organization with strong political undertones. I am a member of The Greater Church of Lucifer, which is seeking to become an actual church in the truest sense of the word. Their focus is one of self-enlightenment and unlocking of the mysteries that surround us, as well as breaking the constraints and mental chains that bind us. I am also a member of Satanic International Network (SIN for short). This is really nothing more than a networking site for like-minded Satanists and other practitioners of Left Hand Path theologies. We as Satanists, for the most part, don’t believe in an actual Satan, but rather we seek to base ourselves on that mythology. I like the idea of Satan giving of the tree of knowledge in the book of Genesis. It’s the same as the Roman Lucifer, the one who brings the Sun, or the Light Bearer, shining truth into all the dark places. Even the Greek Prometheus we see as an aspect of Satan. He was a Titan that defied the Gods to deliver fire into the hands of mortal men. Hence the kick-start of our technology. In all religions we see a Satan, some have this as a balancing force, others as a destroying force. We all know that knowledge can sometimes lead down a destructive path. Some others see him as merely a jovial trickster, like Pan or Dionysus. We see Satan more as a literary hero from works such as The Revolt of Angels.
DeViney: Speaking of which, 99% of the time the prior statement of “red-blooded” in reference to being ‘Merikan is juxtaposed with the phrase “God-fearing”. Now obviously in any religious sense in Western sense, God’s opposite number is viewed as being a spiritual powerhouse. In the Roman Catholic pantheon, for example, Lucifer (dubbed “Satan” upon his expulsion from Paradise) is viewed as near-omniscient, near-omnipresent. How do you think of your faith along the lines of your being a patriot, or do you?
Bridges: I like to think that I am very much a patriot. Why else would a person like me do what he does? America is founded on the sense that everyone is equal, that all religions or lack thereof should be a kept out of Government, and that your [i]nalienable rights to free speech, free press, free worship, gun ownership (for those responsible enough for it), fair trial, certain public programs (such as healthcare, education, and a good LIVING wage) should never be taken from you. Isn’t that the ultimate oppositional idea to the status quo? America was not founded to be a theocracy. Slowly it has eroded into a country ruled by Christian privilege. I can drive 1 mile in any direction and see 100 church signs. If one sign with a pentagram or a Baphomet goes up people lose their minds. That is why you see groups like The Satanic Temple doing what they are doing. It is a revealing of the true nature of conservative law-makers. They say things like “It’s an open forum for distribution of religious materials” and when a Satanic coloring book (off the record I have a copy I will send to you so you can see how PG it is.) shows up alongside Christian religious materials in public schools they shut down all distribution of religious materials in that school. Still a win. I think it is hilarious that it was conservative law-makers in a thinly veiled attempt to strip women of access to contraceptives (so that big businesses would not have to pay extra to cover it on company insurance policies) that brought this on. They claimed a religious freedom argument to strip people of rights to basic healthcare. The contraceptives would be easier on the taxpayer dollar than another child we have to pay for. Patriotism is loving your country. Your country is your people. So I equate patriotism to love for the people of this country. You don’t have to love everything about a country to be patriotic. Just the people.
DeViney: Was Lucifer truly compelled to flee Heaven with one-third of the Angels (now “Demons”), or is the narrative different in your book, so to speak, or is there another storyline altogether wherein you don’t adhere to the traditional, linear stories of God and Man and Lucifer at all?
Bridges: Because that[‘s] what the Bible says happened right? (I am truly laughing right now) I like the Bible. It’s a really-well written book for the time period. Beowulf is better though. Imagine how awesome a parallel universe (where Beowulf is the Bible) would be. The old stories are just that. Stories. Crowley was on to a bunch of things with his comparative study of religion in the 777. How everything in every religion is connected and how it is all one giant puzzle to be put together, except that when you put it together the whole thing fades to nothing. A favorite author of mine, Lon Milo Duquette, once said, “It’s all in your head. You just have no idea how big your head is.” That is the whole of the thing. Angels, Demons, God, all that is nothing more than thought processes that lead to manifestation of a desired result. People call that magick, when simply it is just using your raw will to manifest a desired result. “Hey get me a drink.” I announced my will into the universe and it is made manifest before me through nothing but my sheer will and force of personality. And maybe a few dollars. People dig too hard in their searches for Gods, Demons, and Angels in exterior sources, and they forget to look where all that originates: Self.
DeViney: There’s this prevailing thought, one that generates a good amount of fear in our accursed culture here in America, where Satanism is all about “sinning”. I.e., if you can get away with murder or rape in demonstration of your dedication to rebellion against God, so be it. Clear that up for the Sheeple, please Chris?
Bridges: Satanism is about self-accountability. I know that rape and murder are bad things. Unnatural things. I don’t need a book or a God to tell me what I already know. If I don’t feel guilty about doing something I don’t see the harm in doing it. As long as all parties involved are willful consenting adults and no one else or their property come to any harm, what I do should not involve anyone other than me and a bottle of rye. Sin should be something defined by the individual, not by the man with funniest hat, not by Sky Daddy, not by whomever sacrifices the most virgins (or virginities). If you do something and you feel bad about it, make amends and try not to do it again. If you don’t feel bad about doing it, then maybe it’s not a sin to begin with. People’s perception of what is and isn’t sinful boggles my mind. Homosexuals clearly aren’t remorseful of their homosexual lifestyles. Why should they be? Because an ancient text that condemned homosexuality so as to ensure the proliferation of the Jewish Race said so? You can’t take literal meanings and laws from the Bible or any other religious book. There are no books where the prophets spoke on Corporate Personhood, Cloning, hell, even which lane to ride a bike in. We are talking about people wanting to drag a draconian piece of literature into making rules for a society where one person could wipe out 10000 with a flick of the wrist. It’s inconceivable.

DeViney: You mentioned it in passing during a prior conversation of late that you’d really like to see the Satanic Temple develop a real bastion in the State of Mississippi, and that while it’s going to be “hard work” (it must be for you to call it that) you think it’s a realistic possibility. While anyone reading this should, again, bear in mind that you are NOT an official spokesperson for said Temple, by mission of action you really are and, I mean, you were there on the ground, so to speak, for the unveiling of Baphomet in Detroit and are supporting its placement in Arkansas in the capitol complex next to The Ten Commandments. So please, talk a little bit about this commitment, your passion, and where you see it in five years, not just nationally, but in the Bible Belt, specifically.
Bridges: I will say this: I am in the process of trying to organize secularists, atheists, Satanists, Left Hand Pathers, anyone politically minded and willing to work in some activist campaigns. As far as a Satanic Temple MS Chapter, I hope we get to see one. Organizing something like this in a state where the Christian stranglehold on everything from local to state politics and everything in between is really tricky. When I worked with The Temple in New Orleans we were very focused on community outreach and helping younger people who arrived in a less privileged setting through no fault of their own. One of my favorite projects to work on in New Orleans was the Parisite DIY Skatepark Project. Some of my friends there were skaters and got me into skating. One day we went to skate the ramps and the city had torn them down because they were too close to the railroad tracks. So some of my friends started doing some research and found that the area under the 610 was zoned for recreational use. So they did some fundraising and a couple weeks later we started building ramps under the 610 at Paris Ave and Pleasure St. We fought the city for almost two years about the skate park. Last year was the grand opening of the Parisite Skatepark after a generous donation from Red Bull and Spohn Ranch. Now every Monday there are free red beans, skate contests for all the folks, the skate companies come out and give those kids that live around there all kinds of gear. It has just grown and evolved into almost a subculture in New Orleans. That’s what I want Satanism to be in MS, a community for those religiously disenfranchised to feel like they belong and together to make our voices heard in the community at large. A far as where I see myself in five years, that’s a good question. Hopefully a lot wiser and a lot more ruggedly handsome.
DeViney: Chris, win, lose or draw you and I never lost a party and we’re not likely to start any decade soon. Thanks for taking the time to indulge your Christian rock & roll brother, here. And, by the way: you’re going to Hell.
Bridges: I’ll see you there. I already got a spot picked out for me, [so] you [had] better get a real estate agent down there before all the good property is gone.
P.S. – The crew here at
République! République! In The Mood With “Grand Ole Partier” #2: Marco Rubio
- DeViney, Jack
- 11 March 2016
Next up we’ve got Senator “Little” Marco Rubio (R-FL). This variant of what some kindly call “God’s special creatures” is probably the most
République! République! In The Mood With “Grand Ole Partier” #1: Ted Cruz
- DeViney, Jack
- 10 March 2016

République! République!
In The Mood With GOP [“Grand Ole Partiers”]
Part One: Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX)
Somewhere in the deepest confines of
Gonzonomics: Taking The Donald Seriously
- DeViney, Jack
- 10 March 2016
As more proof of my desire to do more than your standard-issue editorial and every now and then posting some debate video or rant on YouTube,
State of Mind – POTUS Primary Psychoanalysis: The Republicans
- Staff
- 10 March 2016
State of Mind
POTUS Primary Psychoanalysis: The Republicans
Over the past few months,
As 30 April launch looms, ModState bolsters staff, expands allied network
- Staff
- 5 March 2016
the pre-launch dismissal this week of longtime colleague and early ModState editorial signee Jeremy Bennett
Trouble Ahead for Speaker Ryan & Good Vibes in The House
- DeViney, Jack
- 14 February 2016
At a House GOP conference yesterday, the peacemaking sentiment(s) heretofore expressed by House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI) have come under duress before the years’ legislative journey has even truly begun. The so-called “Omnibus” spending deal made to fund the government has sharply divided a Caucus that hardly needed another reason to bicker.
The Speaker, however, made clear his incisive perspective on how “The People’s House” should proceed is limited to three options: go with the status quo, do nothing, or continue into the new year with the feel-good rhetoric of the Speaker and seize on what the Honorable Mr. Ryan feels is an opportunity to bring about a substantial cut in entitlement spending if the House plays ball. The Senate, being the historically less-conservative house, is far less likely to go along with any attempt conjured up by the House to force a confrontation with the President over any significant spending cuts.
While any notable commentary cited coming out of the conference was given on condition of anonymity, several Congressmen offered pointed remarks on both sides of the fence.
“I heard some new ideas but I didn’t hear any new sentiment,” stated Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-SC). However, he liked